Long-term outcomes analysis of flap-based perineal reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: High-risk patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection and pelvic exenteration may benefit from immediate flap reconstruction. However, there is currently no consensus on the ideal flap choice or patient for whom this is necessary. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of using pedicled gracilis flaps for pelvic reconstruction and to analyze predictors of postoperative complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a single reconstructive surgeon's cases between January 2012 and June 2021 identifying patients who underwent perineal reconstruction secondary to oncologic resection. Preoperative and outcome variables were collected and analyzed to determine the risk of developing minor and major wound complications. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were included in the study with most patients (n = 88) undergoing unilateral gracilis flap reconstruction after oncologic resection. The mean follow-up period was 75 months. Of 101 patients, 8 (7.9%) developed early major complications, and an additional 13 (12.9%) developed late major complications. Minor complications developed in 33 patients (32.7%) with most cases being minor wound breakdown requiring local wound care. Most patients (n = 92, 91.1%) did not develop donor site complications. Anal cancer was significantly associated with early major complications, whereas younger age and elevated body mass index were significant predictors of developing minor wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study builds on our previous work that demonstrated the long-term success rate of gracilis flap reconstruction after large pelvic oncologic resections. A few patients developed donor site complications, and perineal complications were usually easily managed with local wound care, thus making the gracilis flap an attractive alternative to abdominal-based flaps.

Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons.

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) are dedicated to ensuring high-quality innovative patient care for surgical patients by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus as well as minimally invasive surgery. The ASCRS and SAGES society members involved in the creation of these guidelines were chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery and enhanced recovery. This consensus document was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus and develop clinical practice guidelines based on the best available evidence. While not proscriptive, these guidelines provide information on which decisions can be made and do not dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, healthcare workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. These guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient. This clinical practice guideline represents a collaborative effort between the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and was approved by both societies.

Survival Outcomes for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma at Academic Versus Community Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare disease with poor outcomes. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is the cornerstone of therapy. We aim to compare outcomes of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma treated at academic versus community hospitals. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database to identify patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma from 2004 to 2016. Patients were divided according to treating facility type: academic or community. Outcomes were assessed using log-rank tests, Cox proportional-hazard modeling, and Kaplan-Meier survival statistics. RESULTS: In total, 2682 patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma were identified. A total of 1272 (47.4%) were treated at an academic facility and 1410 (52.6%) were treated at a community facility. Five hundred forty-six (42.9%) of patients at academic facilities underwent debulking or radical surgery compared to 286 (20.2%) at community facilities. Three hundred sixty-six (28.8%) of patients at academic facilities received chemotherapy on the same day as surgery compared to 147 (10.4%) of patients at community facilities. Unadjusted 5-year survival was 29.7% (95% CI 26.7-32.7) for academic centers compared to 18.3% (95% CI 16.0-20.7) for community centers. In multivariable analysis, community facility was an independent predictor of increased risk of death (HR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.32, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate better survival outcomes for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma treated at academic compared to community facilities. Patients at academic centers underwent surgery and received chemotherapy on the same day as surgery more frequently than those at community centers, suggesting that malignant peritoneal mesothelioma patients may be better served at experienced academic centers.

The Effect of Facility Volume on Survival Following Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies assessing colorectal cancer survival have reported better outcomes when operations are performed at high-volume centers. These studies have largely been cross-sectional, making it difficult to interpret their estimates. We aimed to assess the effect of facility volume on survival following proctectomy for rectal cancer. METHODS: Using data from the National Cancer Database, we included all patients with complete baseline information who underwent proctectomy for non-metastatic rectal cancer between 2004 and 2016. Facility volume was defined as the number of rectal cancer cases managed at the treating center in the calendar year prior to the patient's surgery. Overall survival estimates were obtained for facility volumes ranging from 10 to 100 cases/year. Follow-up began on the day of surgery and continued until loss to follow-up or death. RESULTS: A total of 52,822 patients were eligible. Patients operated on at hospitals with volumes of 10, 30, and 50 cases/year had similar distributions of grade, clinical stage, and neoadjuvant therapies. 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival all improved with increasing facility volume. One-year survival was 94.0% (95% CI: 93.7, 94.3) for hospitals that performed 10 cases/year, 94.5% (95% CI: 94.2, 94.7) for 30 cases/year, and 94.8% (95% CI: 94.5, 95.0) for 50 cases/year. Five-year survival was 68.9% (95% CI: 68.0, 69.7) for hospitals that performed 10 cases/year, 70.8% (95% CI: 70.1, 71.5) for 30 cases/year, and 72.0% (95% CI: 71.2, 72.8) for 50 cases/year. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment at a higher volume facility results in improved survival following proctectomy for rectal cancer, though the small benefits are less profound than previously reported.

The Association Between Sex and Survival for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is rising, despite the introduction of a vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV), the most common etiology of anal SCC. The rate of anal SCC is higher among women and sex-based survival differences may exist. We aimed to examine the association between sex and survival for stage I-IV anal SCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with stage I-IV anal SCC from 2004-2016. Outcomes were assessed utilizing log rank tests, Kaplan-Meier statistics, and Cox proportional-hazard modeling. Subgroup analyses by disease stage and by HPV status were performed. Outcomes of interest were median, 1-, and 5-year survival by sex. RESULTS: There were 31,185 patients with stage I-IV anal SCC. 10,714 (34.3%) were male and 20,471 (65.6%) were female. 1- and 5- year survival was 90.2% (95% CI 89.8 - 90.7) and 67.7% (95% CI 66.9 - 68.5) for females compared to 85.8% (95% CI 85.1 - 86.5) and 55.9% (95% CI 54.7 - 57.0) for males. In subgroup analysis, females demonstrated improved unadjusted and adjusted survival for all stages of disease. Female sex was an independent predictor of improved survival (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.65 - 0.71, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate better overall survival for females compared to males for stage I-IV anal SCC. It is not clear why women have a survival advantage over men, though exposure to prominent risk factors may play a role. High-risk men may warrant routine screening for anal cancer.

Surgical Management of Small Bowel Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Primary small bowel non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is a rare disease representing 2% of small intestine malignancies. There is limited data delineating the optimal treatment for these heterogeneous tumors. We aim to examine relationships between different treatment modalities and surgical outcomes in patients with small bowel lymphoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I-III small bowel lymphoma in 2004-2015 who underwent surgery were identified in the National Cancer Database. Two cohorts were created based on systemic chemotherapy treatment status. The primary outcome was overall survival. An adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the impact of treatment strategy on survival. RESULTS: 2283 patients met inclusion criteria Of these patients, 826 patients (36%) underwent surgical resection alone, and 1457 patients (64%) underwent resection with systemic chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in unadjusted (5-year overall survival, 55% versus 70%) and adjusted analysis (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47-0.63, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Patients with small bowel lymphoma have a low five-year overall survival after surgery. Chemotherapy is associated with improved survival, although one third of patients do not receive this therapy. Several other clinical factors are identified that are also associated with overall survival, including histology subtype, margin status, age, and medical comorbidities. This information can help with prognostication and potentially aid in treatment decision-making.

Lymph Node Positivity in T1/T2 Rectal Cancer: a Word of Caution in an Era of Increased Incidence and Changing Biology for Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of lymph nodes in rectal cancer dictates treatment. The goals of this study are to characterize the contemporary rate of lymph node metastasis in early stage rectal cancer and to re-investigate histologic factors that predict positive lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients with clinical stage I rectal adenocarcinoma. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for lymph node positivity. RESULTS: 12.2% of patients with T1 tumors and 18.0% of patients with T2 tumors had positive lymph nodes. For T1 tumors, positive lymph nodes were present in 9.3% with neither poor differentiation nor lymphovascular invasion (LVI), 17.3% with poor differentiation alone, 34.7% with LVI alone, and 45.0% with both poor differentiation and LVI. For T2 tumors, positive lymph nodes were present in 11.7% with neither poor differentiation nor LVI, 25.3% with poor differentiation alone, 47.3% with LVI alone, and 41.5% with both poor differentiation and LVI. LVI was an independent predictor of positive lymph nodes (OR;4.75,95%CI;3.17-7.11,p < 0.001) for T1 and (OR;6.20,95%CI;4.53-8.51,p < 0.001) T2 tumors. CONCLUSIONS: T1/T2 tumors have higher rates of positive lymph nodes when poor differentiation and LVI are present. These results should be taken into consideration prior to surgical treatment.

Surgical resection improves overall survival of patients with small bowel leiomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: Small bowel leiomyosarcoma (SB LMS) is a rare disease with few studies characterizing its outcomes. This study aims to evaluate surgical outcomes for patients with SB LMS. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried from 2004 to 2016 to identify patients with SB LMS who underwent surgical resection. The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients with SB LMS who had undergone surgical resection were identified. The median age was 63, and the majority of patients were female (56%), White (82%), and had a Charlson comorbidity score of zero (76%). Eighty-one percent of patients had negative margins following surgical resection. Fourteen percent of patients had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Nineteen percent of patients received chemotherapy and 3% of patients received radiation. One-year overall survival was 77% (95% CI: 72-82%) and 5-year overall survival was 43% (95% CI: 36-49%). Higher grade (HR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.10-3.55, p = 0.02) and metastatic disease at diagnosis (HR: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.45-4.55, p = 0.001) were independently associated with higher risk of death. CONCLUSION: SB LMS is a rare disease entity, with treatment centering on complete surgical resection. Our results demonstrate that overall survival is higher than previously thought. Timely diagnosis to allow for complete surgical resection is key, and investigation into the possible role of chemotherapy or radiation therapy is needed.

Sociodemographic predictors of surgery refusal in patients with stage I-III colon cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Over 104 000 cases of colon cancer are estimated to be diagnosed in 2020. Surgical resection is a critical part of colon cancer treatment and adequate resection impacts prognosis. However, some patients refuse potentially curative surgery. We aimed to identify the rate and predictors of surgery refusal among patients with colon cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2004-2015) was queried for patients diagnosed with stage I-III colonic adenocarcinoma. Sociodemographic factors, clinical features, and treatment facility characteristics were collected. Patients who underwent surgery with curative intent were compared to those who refused surgery. Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with surgery refusal. Adjusted survival analysis was performed on propensity-matched cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 151 020 patients were included and 1071 (0.71%) refused surgery. In multivariable analysis older age, Black race, higher Charlson comorbidity score, Medicaid, Medicare, or lack of insurance were predictive of refusing surgery. After propensity matching, there was a significant difference in 5-year survival for patients who refused surgery vs those who underwent surgery (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There are racial and socioeconomic disparities in the refusal of surgery for colon cancer. Further studies are needed to better understand the drivers behind differences in refusing curative surgery for colon cancer.

The Distribution of Colorectal Surgeons in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is a mainstay of colorectal cancer treatment, and prior studies have shown improved outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer by colorectal surgical specialists compared with nonspecialized surgeons. Here, we examine the geographic distribution of colorectal surgeons in the United States and its relationship with sociodemographic characteristics of the served population. METHODS: The Area Health Resource File from 2017 to 2018 was used to identify the number and location of colorectal surgeons practicing throughout the United States and sociodemographic characteristics at the county and hospital referral region (HRR) level. The main outcomes of interest were the density of colorectal surgeons per 100,000 population and associations with sociodemographic characteristics at the county and HRR level based on multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, regions with higher proportion of nonwhite individuals and college-educated individuals had significantly more colorectal surgeons per 100,000 population, whereas regions with higher proportions of uninsured individuals had significantly fewer colorectal surgeons per 100,000 population at both the county and HRR levels. CONCLUSIONS: Geographic and sociodemographic variability exists in the distribution of colorectal surgeons in the United States. Such variability may be contributing to disparities in access to specialized colorectal care.

Treatment of stage I-III rectal cancer: Who is refusing surgery?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical resection is a cornerstone in the management of patients with rectal cancer. Patients may refuse surgical treatment for several reasons although the rate of refusal is currently unknown. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was utilized to identify patients with stage I-III rectal cancer. Patients who refused surgical resection were compared to patients who underwent curative resection. RESULTS: A total of 509 (2.6%) patients with stage I and 2082 (3.5%) patients with stage II/III rectal cancer refused surgery. In multivariable analysis for stage I disease, older age, Black race, and Medicaid/no insurance were independent predictors of surgery refusal. Patients were less likely to refuse surgery if they had a higher income or lived further distances from the treatment facility. In multivariable analysis for stage II/III disease, older age, Black race, insurance other than private, and rural county were independent predictors of surgery refusal. Patients were less likely to refuse surgery if they had higher Charlson comorbidity scores, lived further distances from the treatment facility, or underwent chemoradiation. There was a significant decrease in survival for patients refusing surgery compared to patients undergoing recommended surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of patients refuse surgery for rectal cancer, and this treatment decision significantly affects survival.

Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Is There a Difference in Survival for Crohn's Versus Sporadic Cases?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is well known that Crohn's disease is a risk factor for the development of small bowel adenocarcinoma. However, the association between Crohn's disease-associated small bowel adenocarcinoma and survival is less understood. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of Crohn's disease on survival in small bowel adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma, either associated with Crohn's disease or diagnosed sporadic, were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004-2016. The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS: Of 2668 patients, 493 had Crohn's disease-associated small bowel adenocarcinoma and 2175 had sporadic small bowel adenocarcinoma. Crohn's disease patients were more likely to present at a younger age [62 vs 65, p < 0.001], have tumours located in the ileum [62.7% vs 25.0%, p < 0.001], and have poorly differentiated tumours [47.0% vs 31.7%, p < 0.001] compared with sporadic small bowel adenocarcinoma. Factors associated with significantly decreased survival included older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.03, p < 0.00)], higher Charlson score [HR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.13-1.72, p = 0.002], higher tumour grade [HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04-1.14, p < 0.001], positive surgical margins [HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.39-1.84, p < 0.001], and higher stage of disease [HR: 1.90, 3.75, 8.13, 95% CI: 1.37-2.64, 2.68-5.24, 5.77-11.47, for II, III, IV, respectively, compared with I, all p < 0.001]. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved survival [HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.53-0.70, p < 0.001]. Crohn's disease [HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99-1.02, p = 0.39], was not significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSION: Compared with sporadic patients, Crohn's disease patients have similar overall survival, and Crohn's disease is not an independent risk factor for mortality.

Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program: A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have historically been associated with high morbidity given the physiologic insult of an extensive operation. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways have been successful in improving postoperative outcomes for many procedures but have not been well studied in these cases. We examined the feasibility and effect of ERAS pathway implementation for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent CRS/HIPEC between October 2015 to September 2018 were identified. Patient characteristics, disease pathology, and perioperative outcome data were obtained. Primary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-d readmissions, renal dysfunction, and complications. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients who were included, 11 (35.5%) patients underwent CRS/HIPEC prior to the implementation of the ERAS pathway, and 20 (64.5%) patients underwent CRS/HIPEC according to the ERAS guidelines. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical or pathologic characteristics between groups. There was a significant decrease in LOS with ERAS pathway management from 9 d to 6 d (P = 0.002). No patients from either cohort experienced acute kidney injury. There was no significant difference in 30-d readmission rates or complications. CONCLUSIONS: In this feasibility study, ERAS pathway utilization significantly decreased postoperative LOS for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC, without evidence of increased complications or readmissions. ERAS programs should be considered for integration into future CRS/HIPEC protocols.

Treatment patterns and outcomes in goblet cell carcinoid tumors of the appendix.

BACKGROUND: Goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) tumors of the appendix are a rare malignancy. We aim to examine the overall survival per stage and the relationship between different treatment modalities and outcomes for patients with GCC tumors of the appendix. METHODS: We identified patients with GCC tumors of the appendix from the National Cancer Database. The main outcome was overall patient survival and cox proportional hazard models were used to ascertain predictors of survival. RESULTS: There were 2552 patients identified. The median age of diagnosis was 57 (interquartile range: 49-65) and 52.3% of patients were female. The 5-year survival for Stage I disease was 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.2%-95.7%), for Stage II disease was 90.5% (95% CI: 85.8%-93.7%), for Stage III disease was 57.0% (95% CI: 45.0%-67.3%), and for Stage IV disease was 18.9% (95% CI: 9.3%-31.0%). In a Cox proportional hazard model, older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.1; 95% CI: 1.03-1.12; P < .001), lymph node metastasis (HR: 6.9; 95% CI: 2.76-17.01; P < .001), and positive surgical margins (HR: 2.9; 95% CI:1.13-7.26; P = .003) were associated with worse overall survival for Stages I to III disease while only older age (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.002-1.06; P = .04) was associated with worse overall survival for Stage IV disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GCC tumors of the appendix who have the nonmetastatic disease have a high 5-year survival. We have identified several prognostic factors for GCC.

Does race impact survival for patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Racial disparities are known to impact cancer outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess current racial disparities in outcomes of anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with anal SCC. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival. RESULTS: There were 32 255 (88.1%) White patients and 4342 (11.9%) Black patients identified with anal SCC. Compared to White patients, Black patients were more likely to be younger, have lower median income, and be insured with Medicaid (all P < .001). The 5-year overall survival of Black and White patients for stage I disease was 71.2% and 80.6% (P < .001), for stage II disease, was 64.6% and 69.3% (P = .001), for stage III disease was 50.9% and 58.1% (P < .001), and for stage IV disease was 22.1% and 21.9% (P = .20). In a cox regression analysis, Black race was associated with significantly worse survival in stage I (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.07-1.76, P = .01), stage II (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.14-1.48, P < .001), and stage III disease (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.16-1.47, P < .001) but not for stage IV disease (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.89-1.35, P = .41). CONCLUSIONS: Black race is correlated with worse survival in patients diagnosed with anal SCC. This disparity in survival is likely multifactorial and requires further study.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III mucinous colon cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Mucinous adenocarcinoma is a subtype of colonic adenocarcinoma associated with worse survival compared to nonmucinous adenocarcinoma. Prior studies on the effect of chemotherapy on survival in mucinous adenocarcinoma have shown mixed results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy on the survival of patients with stage II and III mucinous adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients diagnosed with stage II or III nonmucinous adenocarcinoma or mucinous adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2016. The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS: Fourteen thousand and three hundred patients with stage II mucinous colon adenocarcinoma and 16 741 patients with stage III mucinous colon adenocarcinoma were identified. There was no significant difference in survival between nonmucinous adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma patients in adjusted analysis for stage II disease (HR:1.00, 95%CI:0.98-1.02, P = .99), but there was a significant difference for stage III disease (HR:1.05, 95%CI:1.03-1.07, P < .001). In propensity-matched cohorts of patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma, chemotherapy was significantly associated with survival in stage II (HR:0.79, 95%CI:0.69-0.90, P < .001) and stage III disease (HR:0.56, 95%CI:0.52-0.60, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stage II or stage III mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colon who are given adjuvant chemotherapy have significantly improved survival compared to patients not given chemotherapy.

Rectal-prolapse repair in men is safe, but outcomes are not well understood.

INTRODUCTION: Rectal prolapse is a condition that occurs infrequently in men and there is little literature guiding treatment in this population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical approach and outcomes of rectal-prolapse repair in men. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter review was conducted of consecutive men who underwent rectal-prolapse repair between 2004 and 2014. Surgical approaches and outcomes, including erectile function and fecal continence, were evaluated. RESULTS: During the study period, 58 men underwent rectal-prolapse repair and the mean age of repair was 52.7 ± 24.1 years. The mean follow-up was 13.2 months (range, 0.5-117 months). The majority of patients underwent endoscopic evaluation (78%), but few patients underwent anal manometry (16%), defecography (9%) or ultrasound (3%). Ten patients (17%) underwent biofeedback/pelvic-floor physical therapy prior to repair. Nineteen patients (33%) underwent a perineal approach (most were perineal proctosigmoidectomy). Thirty-nine patients (67%) underwent repair using an abdominal approach (all were suture rectopexy) and, of these, 77% were completed using a minimally invasive technique. The overall complication rate was 26% including urinary retention (16%), which was more common in patients undergoing the perineal approach (32% vs. 8%, P = 0.028), urinary-tract infection (7%) and wound infection (3%). The overall recurrence rate was 9%, with no difference between abdominal and perineal approaches. Information on sexual function was missing in the majority of patients  both before and after surgery (76% and 78%, respectively). CONCLUSION:  Rectal-prolapse repair in men is safe and has a low recurrence rate; however, sexual function was poorly recorded across all institutions. Further studies are needed to evaluate to best approach to and functional outcomes of rectal-prolapse repair in men.